If there is a conflict between adopted references, which reference should be used?

When navigating conflicts between adopted references in standards, the choice of using the more stringent standard is based on the principle of prioritizing safety and quality. Stricter standards often incorporate more comprehensive safety measures, regulatory requirements, or technical specifications, which can ensure greater protection for individuals, equipment, and the environment. This approach aligns with the philosophy that, when it comes to compliance and safety regulations, erring on the side of caution helps prevent potential hazards and ensures operational integrity.

Less stringent standards might allow for greater flexibility or cost savings, but these benefits can come at the expense of safety and reliability. Therefore, opting for the more stringent standard is a recommended practice in many industries, including those regulated by closed circuit television licensing, as it fosters a culture of compliance and diligence.

In contrast, choosing the oldest applicable standard may not reflect current technological advancements or safety protocols. Selecting based on cost can lead to compromising quality and effectiveness, while broad applicability does not guarantee that the standard addresses specific requirements pertinent to the current situation. Hence, the best practice is to adopt the more stringent standard in the event of a conflict.